Anonymous Login
Employee Login
Employer Login
 
Our Services
Send a Message
Start a Dialogue
Our Advice
User Forum
Professional Help
Report a Problem
Take a Survey
 
Tell Me More
I am an Employee
I am an Employer
How is it Anonymous?
How Does it Work?
Other F.A.Q.
 
Common Concerns
Workplace Bullying
Workplace Violence
Safety Issues
Health Issues
Overworking Issues
Poor Employee Morale
Lack of Training
Lack of Tools
Sexual Harassment
Discrimination
Wrongful Termination
Favoritism
Disability Feasibility
Unethical Behavior
Corporate Fraud
Employee Theft
Lying
Falsifying Documents
Embezzlement
Poor Supervision
Poor Communication
Office Romance
Overworked Employees
Office Odors
 

Anonymous Employee User Forum

 

 
Send this page to a friend Send this page to a friend
 
Ask a question Post a Question to the Forum
 
Suggest Advice Suggest advice for this problem

Can you help this person? They have a problem with
Workplace Bullying and need some advice.

 

See the next submission
This is the original problem from an employee...
On the matter of employee monitoring--monitoring of employees by a supervisor in a company is necessary and warranted usually required (obviously); thus the terms “supervisor” and “subordinate.” However, excessive monitoring of a subordinate by a supervisor is, especially when it demonstrates or sanctions malice, to say the least, unscrupulous and unethical.


Permitted (by management) excessive monitoring of employees on a peer-to-peer basis is not only unscrupulous and unethical it is illegal in California and many cities in the United States. Although there is no jurisdiction in place in North Dakota prohibiting such or deeming it illegal most would agree that it would not be conducive to a prosperous work environment.


Although North Dakota has not enacted similar laws with such protections concerning excessive monitoring, when excessive monitoring in itself is persuasive of creating a hostile work environment causing discriminatory workplace harassment which is severe, recurring and pervasive it is illegal under the eyes of the Federal courts and is prohibited under Federal Discrimination laws.


I must point out that the extensive monitoring in this case is not being done on a supervisor to subordinate level but rather on a peer-to-peer basis--the perpetrator holds the same job title as the target person and has no obligation nor requirement what-so-ever to report peers or any other employee’s actions to anyone. Their job descriptions are identical. This monitoring includes but is not limited to persistent behavior using unwarranted, invalid criticism, nit-picking, and faultfinding. The perpetrator is adept at encouraging conflict mainly by the dissemination of disparaging stories concerning the target person, (whether they be embellishment of minor incidents or pure fabrications) to fellow employees, and/or immediate supervisors, and/or upper management within the organization. These stories are selective and premeditated and are told with the intention of inflicting psychological violence.


While most acts of commission here are verbal, others are nonverbal. Nonverbal communications or behaviors such as snubbing while passing or rolling of the eyes to show contempt, or just putting forth a blatant “bad attitude” are exhibited here. Although these nonverbal communications/behaviors themselves, (though being inappropriate), can easily be ignored, or can just be perceived as being childish or rude, or can possibly be attributed to just bad manners; repeatedly and over long periods of time are none-the-less illegitimate behavior.


The target person or victim (if you will) in this matter has a well-defined set of values and is unwilling to compromise them; has a strong sense of integrity; is honest, trustworthy, and reliable; and is good at the position held in employment. However, because of the ability or power of the perpetrator to convince, persuade others and the fact that the perpetrator fraternizes with upper management within the company the victim is of firm belief that tolerating this environment is a condition of continued employment.

 
   
Employee: staloisius
Rate This: (Higher = Better)

 

 
 
 
Do you have some advice that can help this person?
Do you have a problem you would like advice for?

Disclaimer: The advice displayed within this site is not legal advice and is not to be taken as legal or professional advice in any way. Any communication within this forum is intended only to discuss a number of possible options. All ratings have come from site visitors and reflect a peer review only.

 

add to del.icio.us
add to Del.icio.us  
add this page as a link in digg
add to digg